<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>drivelocity.com &#187; John Hughes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drivelocity.com/tag/john-hughes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drivelocity.com</link>
	<description>senseless nonsense in a nonsensical world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:10:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to RiverWrap?</title>
		<link>http://drivelocity.com/on-the-web/what-happened-to-riverwrap/</link>
		<comments>http://drivelocity.com/on-the-web/what-happened-to-riverwrap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drivelocity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On The Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drivelocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IpsoSacto.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RiverWrap.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drivelocity.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sacramento bloggers are most likely familiar with the blog aggregators IpsoSacto.com and RiverWrap.com&#8230; When I started drivelocity, I waited a seemingly decent amount of time before submitting it to those two sites. I didn&#8217;t want to be turned down because the site was too new, or didn&#8217;t have enough content. It was accepted by IpsoSacto [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacramento bloggers are most likely familiar with the blog aggregators <a href="http://ipsosacto.com/" target="_blank">IpsoSacto.com</a> and <a href="http://riverwrap.com" target="_blank">RiverWrap.com</a>&#8230; When I started drivelocity, I waited a seemingly decent amount of time before submitting it to those two sites. I didn&#8217;t want to be turned down because the site was too new, or didn&#8217;t have enough content. It was accepted by IpsoSacto quickly; however, I&#8217;m still waiting on RiverWrap.</p>
<p>I visit both of those sites almost daily, and I&#8217;ve noticed a major difference. The content (feeds) on IpsoSacto are updated more frequently and there are a lot more of them. I recall when RiverWrap started, it was doing well, looks better and seemed more promising, though pretty much identical in function. As I check the various categories on both sites, I see that RiverWrap is getting stagnant. There aren&#8217;t enough feeds to keep it moving and it takes me only a minute to find that there isn&#8217;t anything new worth reading. To be quite honest, I don&#8217;t find anything there that I don&#8217;t find on IpsoSacto.</p>
<p>So, kudos to IpsoSacto and to <a href="http://rtrider.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">John Hughes</a> who runs it! Thank you for including drivelocity. Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>RiverWrap, what happened? Why have my emails gone unanswered? Is <a href="http://prospercreative.com/" target="_blank">Prosper Creative Media</a> planning on continuing RiverWrap? Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drivelocity.com/on-the-web/what-happened-to-riverwrap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
